➢ David created the Affidavit through a legal process whereby he sought the agreement of the facts in the Affidavit from those he sent the Affidavit to (MPs) and then published it with a decree so that it is on the public record for all to view and use. The facts are on and for the record and therefore agreed to and as such, apply to all. 

➢ We keep getting asked the same question again and again over and over again. This Affidavit is the 657 formal and legal agreement FOUNDATION in agreed fact.. THAT. .. The government are all, without exception, ALL Criminals. Outright criminal scumbags and terrorists. There is no escape. This Affidavit, as David told us, makes Judges shit their knickers. Remember this: NO, You don’t have to change a damn thing. Use it exactly as it is. That’s why it is made public with the Public cover declaration. 7 Billion people can use this. That’s the advanced thinking 5 years ago when Baron David Ward made it Public. – Adrian James 

➢ Right lets clear up the reason why those 3 Acts and Statutes managed to survive when the 8 million went in the bin on the 29th May 2013. The Acts and Statutes are there, but it was always a question of obligation under those Acts and Statutes. David proved the blatant obvious but it was overlooked by everyone, past and present. Without the consent of the governed then the rules have no enforceability. There is no contract with the governed. Not a single one. To identify the fraud and the method in which they have been committing this fraud then David looked at the company policy itself. Although it is agreed that the people are not members of the public, not on the public pay roll and therefore not obligated, the people acting in their capacity as (think of a profession…Mp Judge CEO of HMRC for example) they ARE obligated. The Companies Act 2006 s44 Execution of documents (UK) and the Corporations Act 2001 (Australia). This Act which is company policy explains how a document should be legally signed to be valid and compliant. 99.9% of documents are not signed. They mostly have fraudulent signatories. “The legal department” “Customer Services Team which is not a man or woman taking liability for what is said in the documents. A computer graphic is not a valid or acceptable signature either. The Bills of Exchange Act gives further clarity on what rules of their own policy are being broken in order to commit the fraud. Sometimes the answer seems long winded but the more you read the statement of facts the more you see what I mean. Lastly the Fraud Act. Where a person may be guilty of an offence even if his or her conduct consisted of an omission rather an act. They fail to tell you a lot. This much is obvious now your eyes are wide open. – Adrian James 

Peter-joseph: Sending the affidavit with YOUR crest and seal gives them 28 days. Sending David’s or mine means you can start a lien in 48 hours and that is because they are already on the public record. The affidavit with YOUR OWN crest and seal can be used the same way but only once it has become a public document by waiting the 28 days and then sending the public announcement and decree. 

➢ You can write a covering letter and it can be as short or as long as you like. There are examples in the BDW Facebook groups, in the FAQ document and links to them here. 

➢ ‘We’ is used as it represents who we are writing on behalf of and is stated in the ‘signature’ – 

For and on behalf of the Principal legal embodiment by the title of MR DAVID WARD 

For and on behalf of the Attorney General of the House of WARD 

For and on behalf of Baron David of the House of Ward 

We have three strikes here for and on behalf of: For and on behalf of… means for something or someone. 

The PRINCIPAL legal embodiment by the title of MR DAVID WARD means the highest it can be (principal), MR DAVID WARD. This means any other MR DAVID, Mr David is within this category and is a servant in title. 

The Attorney General of the House of WARD (note the capitals) is the highest of the high in State & Law & Ministerial terms of that House and (categories) as above is a servant in title. 

The Baron David of the House of Ward is a natural born title as a natural born Baron from Adam has no master, he is the highest he can be in title. Each three of these are for and on behalf of each other (three strikes) and yet it is from the House of Ward. 

➢ The whole Affidavit! If you are sending an already published Affidavit, you send the whole document with the decree attached in front of the Affidavit – you don’t change a thing. 

➢ As long as you haven’t changed anything and have made no claims, then you can’t get in trouble. The facts are already agreed to and on and for the record. 

➢ You may do either. Emailing is a valid form of sending the affidavit and will be much kinder to your finances as sending registered mail can become expensive. 

➢ We have no control over what others do. As long as the email doesn’t bounce back, then it can be considered delivered. We can’t make them read an email anymore than we can make them open and read mail sent via post. 

➢ This is what criminals do. Yes they are terrorists and they have a massive infrastructure to follow up with. This does get very ugly and brutal. This is what will happen when you don’t pay the criminals. It’s relentless because if they don’t get your cash they will starve. It is their job to steal from you.

Peter: The reason is because the whole system is corrupt and the departments who are supposed to investigate these crimes are a part of the crime. 

When printing the affidavit or a lien, an embossing stamp with your seal is used to ‘sign’ the document where your signature is displayed. It only needs to be embossed on the signature page. All other pages have the digital/graphic seal.

Seal
Baron David Ward shared this information on why we put our seal on each page :
Your email is your address. That’s why it is called an Email address. Its sent to their email address.
Paper is Paper. That needs your Postal address.
Your Crest and Great seal on every page and page numbering as well.
Back in the day a document was a long scroll as long as it needed to be. Now we use A4 paper. So that needs each page numbered with the crest and the seal on every page. This is etiquette and protocol. Simply the way things should be done.
So if you have one you can add your crest and great seal graphics to the email as well.

Signature
This following information may help people comprehend why the signature is written as it is.
There is a very very clever ‘motion’ for want of a word in David’s (your) affidavit that many seem to miss.
Here is the motion:
For and on behalf of the Principal legal embodiment by the title of MR DAVID WARD.
For and on behalf of the attorney General of the House of Ward.
For and on behalf of Baron David of the House of Ward.
All rights reserved.

Why am I saying this?
We have three strikes here for and on behalf of: For and on behalf of… means for something or someone.
The PRINCIPAL legal embodiment by the title of MR DAVID WARD means the highest it can be (principal), MR DAVID WARD.
This means any other MR DAVID, Mr David is within this category and is a servant in title.
The Attorney General of the House of WARD (note the capitals) is the highest of the high in State & Law & Ministerial terms of that House and (categories) as above is a servant in title.
The Baron David of the House of Ward is a natural born title as a natural born Baron from Adam has no master, he is the highest he can be in title.
Each three of these are for and on behalf of each other (three strikes) and yet it is from the House of Ward.
Somebody must have written these WORDS, it can only be a man that wrote these WORDS.
An affidavit of truth brings the living (wo)man into ANY court should they so wish to pursue it!
But who would want to persist with this House of Ward or your House? Is this why there is no resistance?
Food for thought.

What is a real Baron?

What is a real Baron you will all want to know…

What is it that makes a Baron, a Baron?

Is there a difference between a Hereditary Titled Baron (Nobility) and a real Baron by natural descent?

Is there any subversion where a Titled Baron is less in status to a real Baron?

What is a Titled Baron and where do we look for clues?

What is a Baron.

It is correct to observe that he who gives an oath is in service of that oath, Other wise there would be no point in taking the oath.

There are many oaths. One would be a sworn oath of elegance. An oath of service (Military)

Some US citizens swear an oath of elegance to a flag.

This oath puts them in service to the flag.

And a constitution they never signed that was signed by a load of dead guys.

The queen swore an oath at here coronation. Then the queen is a servant to that oath with a status of servant.

Anybody else who swears an oath to the queen is by default a servants, servant.

Both of which have the status of servant.

Servants cannot create law. They are servants.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMBHfVjsIZo

1957. I do not give you laws or administer Justice.

It is not possible for a servant to create laws.

HM Courts and tribunal services clearly is not a place of law and justice. But a company that provides a service.

I digress.

An Hereditary Titled Baron is at the barest of the queen who is a servant and a titled Baron is the servant of a servant.

If the Barons of 1215 were servants of the monarch then they would have lost their heads for treason.

Clearly the Barons of 1215 did not lose their heads for treason.

The Barons of 1215 where clearly not hereditary titled Barons at the barest of the monarch who swore an oath to the Monarch. If they was then they would have lost there heads for High treason with the great charter. There would not have been a great charter.

The question is not who the Barons where as we know their names but what is a Baron as clearly a Baron By natural decent is superior to a Monarch who is a servant by way of the oath to become Monarch.

SO what is a Baron?

What is a Baron By natural decent and not a titled Baron?

What is a Baron.

What does the Word Baron mean?

What is the origin of the Word, Where does it come from?

Clearly there is some subversion here.

Baron is a French word. Baron, Baroness, Barony.

It is said that a Baron is a land owner but is that correct.

Can a Man own land?

Does he have a Bill of exchange from God?

Who owns the Dog?

The Dog or the fleas on the Dog?

This claim of ownership of land is nothing more than a claim?

Christopher Columbus was an Italian explorer, navigator, coloniser and citizen of the Republic of Genoa. Under the auspices of the Catholic Monarchs of Spain, he completed four voyages across the Atlantic Ocean. He Claimed the US land in the name of the King.

The guy was a pirate who declared a claim to the land.

I digress again. What is a Baron as clearly this has nothing to do with Land.

Clearly we need a clear definition as to what a Baron is and What a Baron is not.

That took me three solid months work and it was hard earned.

I tracked the etymology of the word through 6 or 7 languages and back to the Latin before I found the definitive answer as to what a Baron is not.

The English for the Latin is Barrow Man

So WTF is a Barrow Man?

A Barrow Man is not in Service (Military)

A Barrow Man is not a paid servant to another.

A Barrow Man is not indentured to another by agreement. (Apprentice)

A Barrow Man is not in service by way of an Oath. (Monarch)

A Barrow Man is not a Slave.

A Barrow Man has no Master.

A Baron by natural decent is the highest Status on the planet.

Superior to a Monarch as a Monarch is a Servant by choice and the oath.

This is why the Barons of 1215 did not lose their heads for treason.

Who is your Master?

A Slave knows his Masters Name.

Clearly there is some subversion as the 64.2 million people on this land have no clue as to who they are.

A Baron would not say that somebody ought to do something about that.

A Baron would sort it out himself.

A Baron has no Master.

A Baron cannot rebel as there is no Master for a Baron to rebel against. There is no such thing as Lawful rebellion. Only Slaves can rebel.

Know thyself First.

What is a Baron? Being a Baron has nothing to do with title.

A Baron is of valour.

A Barons heart knows only virtue.

A Baron defends the helpless.

A Barons might up hold’s the weak.

A Barons word speaks only truth.

A Barons wrath undoes the wicked.

Are You A Baron?

When will you become that which you are?